Salinger uses the conflict between Slagle and Holden to suggest that class differences separate pack. Religion, resembling m superstary, is what separates people. Dick Slagle roomed with Holden while attending Elkton Hills. Slagle had inexpensive suitcases un akin Holdens Gladstones. Slagle hid his suitcases to a lower place his bed, so that way they would non be sitting following(a) to Holdens, and be locatings so people might think that the Gladstones were his. When Holden became cognizant of this, he vest his under his bed as well, scarcely then later on, Slagle moved Holdens suitcases back on the rack. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The suitcases conk out traits or so both boys. It shows that there are three sides to everyone. Because Slagle cherished well-to-do status, he was divided. On one hand he cute to be Holden, on the other hand, he say nap Holden. Slagle was pertain with how people would view him, and as a result, he hid his suitcases and put Hold ens back on the rack. All because of money, Slagle mat short and worried that he was inferior, and non as exhaustively as Holden. Although, because Slagle was jealous, he then felt it was necessary to put Holden down. He requisites people to think that he is wealthy because he is concerned about well-disposed status. He was unendingly truism stuck-up things about them, my suitcases, for instance. He kept saying they were in all case mew and bourgeoisÂ(108). Slagle did non respect high social status, so he instead made period of play of Holden. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Holden also had conflicting sides within him. There was a side to Holden that cared about values and people. He cared about ideals, morals, and whether or not people are true and authentic. The other side of Holden always set forth people as being phony, and disliking the world. hearty status also mattered to Holden as well. He akind Stradlater better than Slagle, because Stradlater was r each to Holden. Its one of the reasons why ! I roomed with a stupid bastard equal Stradlater. At least his suitcases were as good as mineÂ(109). Stradlater never worried, he was in love with himself, and virtually of all, he was already wealthy. In the middle of the novel, Holden ranted about a revolting movie he saw.
It was so putrid I couldnt hit my eyes off itÂ(138). He was so interest by the movie because of how gross it was. The movie was about nigh sappy, manufacturing apologue with a happy ending. In the movie, everyone in the degree was poorer compared to the duke, even though the girl he met was middle class. In the end, everyone win ds up with someone no matter what his or her social status is, and it is a happy ending. Even the Great Dane salute a mate and had babies, which was foreshadowing that everyone else would have children as well. This was ironical that Holden talked about this movie because in his mind, everyone compared to him, was poorer, except for those of the same status. Holden was like the duke, Stradlater like Marcia, and Slagle was like the girl. Only, Holden and Slagle did not get along, and therefore did not have a happy ending unlike the movie. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment