Reflections on Perception of Reality Essay Example for Free

Reflections on Perception of Reality EssayI have always believed in what I saw, what I heard, and what I ensured. As these elements play a authoritative role of perceiving the existence around me, it is very hard to distrust the man. However, it was not a long agone that I began to ponder about this issue much profoundly. What do I really perceive? Could I precisely explain our perception without the help of science? As I spend more age cerebrateing about this fascinating issue, I realized that it is necessary to analyze how the nature of perceptual experience relates to pragmatism, and to science. The problems of perception do not only lie on the take of metaphysics but alike on the context of epistemology. Discussing long philosophical congeals about the nature of perceptual experience is the first step to bod my own perspective on perception. Identifying and comparing reasonable interpretations and support of various assertions is thitherfore a mark to successfull y solidifying my argument. I would like to begin by introducing my ideas on perceiving the world that I am currently living in.In my opinion, my perception towards the world would depend on how to deal with appargonntly overt truths about my experience of the world with the possibility of particular types of perceptual errors. Although I make myself open to the reality, this point of openness is sometimes frightened by the existence of certain illusions. For this reason, philosophical hypothesis of perception call for to respond to this threat by providing an account of perception that preserves central and significant features of perception. Materialism argues that there exists some vagabond of reality that is independent of the human mind, consciousness, and perception.According to corporealism, there is a real material world, which consists of matter and energy and obeys some natural laws independent of human mind. As far as I understand, this epistemological materialism arg ues that logical experience does not contain a theory about what reality is, but rather about how we should treat reality. This epistemological materialism argues that all statements should be meaningful, and that in order to be meaningful a statement should be testable and verifiable, carving away metaphysics. Testable statements must then bring up to scientific properties if observers are to agree.Therefore, statements of mind, reflecting internal feelings, thoughts, and motives are meaningless unless they display some physiological change or behavior. Materialism seems to offer a simple and efficient perspective on reality, which indeed appears to be in agreement with our experience and observations. Moreover, materialism also seems to be the only metaphysics most consistent with scientific intimacy. unless if the materialism was clearly to be unfeigned, the world would be without purpose and my life would be absolutely meaningless. twain being a moral human through free wi ll and taking responsibilities for immoral actions would be delusion. This is certainly not the case for all of us. We, as human beings, strive to give meanings and purposes to our lives. Idealism, on the incompatible hand, argues that there is no order of reality independent of human minds and morality. It gives supreme power to minds over some other physical values such as body. Material substances would have no existence independent of mind, or while existing, this reality may exhibit human values and morality.It may also be true that realitys basic nature could be mind in that our apprehension of reality is more determined by mind than matter. Most idealists believe that there is a fundamental unity to the world which is simply greater than the sum of its parts. However, I think that there is a close connection between the existence of our morality and the universe as our values imply something more to the universe than just matter, laws, and physical substances. I might have become the unique outgrowth through physical processes, and my mind could stable qualitatively differ.My mind may be self-actualizing while the rest of nature and reality could be until now the realm of matter. The reality therefore would be able to contain mind and matter at the akin time. I would also like to underline the importance of the nature of knowledge. We need to acknowledge that our sensory knowledge is in fact imperfect as not everyone has exactly the same perceptions and impressions of external reality. We are unfeignedly chained to our bodies and could only appreciate certitudes in the privacy of our minds.Hence, I believe that our knowledge and perceptions of reality could never be perfect. Beyond what we could know, reality may still consist of physical interpretations. Constructionism argues that perceptual experiences consist of representations that are constructed by the mind that express external reality. And perceptual experiences both(prenominal) involv e objective lens from the world and subject material supplied by mind. In other words, my perceptual visions are being constructed and my experience contains the representations of that reality.Basically constructionism is the top of compromise between materialism and idealism. As the major focus of constructionism is to unveil the ways in which individuals turn out to form the creation of their perceived reality, it involves guessing at the ways the world is being created and shaped into reality. For this reason, I believe that reality could be seen as a continuous and dynamic process while it is reproduced by human beings acting on our interpretations and knowledge. My belief is closely in line with this view of constructionism.I think that everyone tends to interpret and construct a reality based on his or her experiences and interactions with circumstances. Although the world outside our minds is considered to be objective and material, it may still be perceived subjectively by us, depending upon different values and morality each one of us holds. The discussion of the nature of reality and its perception, however, does not end here. It is crucial to look at this issue from a different point of view epistemology dimension.There exist two uttermost(a) arguments for describing the nature of knowledge cerebrate to the perceptual experiences. Positive science, which is based on materialism, explains that the only true knowledge one could learn about the nature of reality is primarily dependent on science which provides objective knowledge. But this view does not fully explain the nature of knowledge. Intuitionism, which is based on idealism, asserts that there are different forms of knowledge that the mind has access to. Therefore, no empirical investigation is actually necessary.We could hardly point out above two different ideas about the nature of knowledge as they are closely linked to each other. In my opinion, science is used to prove and validat e our intuitionism by showing the actual models and data. They both then provide us with a sense of justification for the nature of knowledge. Realizing that there are different philosophical positions about the nature of perceptual experience and its relation to reality, and to science is essential to successfully sense the nature of reality and knowledge.We have discussed interpretations and critique of the fundamental beliefs that explain the relationship between perception and reality. As we know, it is not easy to simply conclude which theory is the most powerful in explaining such a complicated subject. I believe, however, that the constructionism is the most plausible theory that holds valid argument along with the combination of arbitrary science and intuitionism. How we perceive the reality not only depends on the physical world and materials but also on the experience and morals we retain.Scientific data and methods as well as intuitionism and insight do play a significa nt role in supporting the conceptual space produced by broad philosophical positions. Because perception is a dynamic dispute between the attempts of the world to impose a reality and our efforts to transform this reality into our own perspective, it is important for us to develop our own perspective gradually. Thus, my initial position towards the nature of reality and science may still change and later shape a untried theory as we go through more studies and discussions in the course of psychology.